Payoda
Payoda
Get a Demo β†’

The densest standards stack
in industry β€” read,
indexed, reasoned.

Upstream, midstream, downstream, LNG, refining, and petrochemical operators face the densest standards stack in industry β€” owner specifications layered over ASME, API, NACE, and ISO. The Platform reads it all and reasons across project addenda that change clause-by-clause meaning. Built for the operator, EPC, and PMC review chain.

Built for
πŸ›’οΈUpstream & Production🚒Midstream & LNG🏭Downstream & Refiningβš—οΈPetrochemicalπŸ”§Turnaround & Maintenance

The Challenge

A wrong parameter on a datasheet doesn't show up at fabrication. It shows up months later, when it's expensive.

Every operator, EPC, and PMC team in oil & gas runs the same review gauntlet β€” datasheets, P&IDs, BODs, and SPPs checked clause-by-clause against owner standards layered over ASME, API, NACE, and ISO. By hand. Under deadline. With addenda that override base standards in ways that aren't always obvious.

01

The standards stack is layered

Owner codes (operator-specific specifications), international standards (ASME, API, NACE, ISO), and project addenda that override the base standards. Get the hierarchy wrong, the review is wrong β€” and the finding is indefensible to the PMC team.

02

Volume crushes review

A single capital project carries thousands of datasheets, hundreds of P&IDs, and dozens of BODs. Each checked against multiple standards. Senior discipline engineers spend most of their time on lookup, not on judgment.

03

Misses are caught late

A wrong parameter at design becomes a wrong parameter on a procurement spec. Caught at fabrication or commissioning, the cost is orders of magnitude higher than catching it in design review.

04

Addendum override hierarchy

Project addendum P2-A14 may override ASME B16.5 Β§ 2.3.1 β€” but only for specific equipment classes under specific conditions. Manual reviewers miss this. Similarity-based AI misses it worse.

05

NACE / sour-service complexity

ISO 15156 / NACE MR0175 compliance turns on material limits, hardness thresholds, and process conditions that interact across documents. A finding on one datasheet may depend on a parameter buried in a BOD.

06

Audit defensibility under PMC scrutiny

The PMC team will reject any finding that doesn't cite a specific clause. They will reject any verdict where confidence and verdict are conflated. They will reject any review trail where a reviewer's override isn't logged.

70-80%

reduction in review cycle time on capital projects

10Γ—

reviewer throughput per discipline lead

60K+

documents tested per active engagement

240+

standards loaded across operators & codes

Standards Coverage

Every code that matters in oil & gas β€” pre-loaded.

The Platform comes pre-indexed with the international codes that anchor every oil & gas review. Layer your owner specifications and project addenda on top β€” The Platform handles the override hierarchy automatically.

ASME B16.5ASME B31.3ASME B31.4ASME B31.8ASME VIIIAPI 6AAPI 570API 650API 1104NACE MR0175NACE SP0169ISO 15156ISO 13628EN 13480+ owner specs+ project addenda
CriticalDS-2401-COMP-V03 Β· Page 4Non-Compliant

Specified design pressure (78 barg) exceeds the maximum allowable working pressure for the selected flange rating.

Cited clause Β· ASME B16.5 Β§ 2.3.1 (with project addendum P2-A14 override)
"The maximum allowable working pressure for Class 600 flanges in carbon steel at the rated temperature shall not exceed 75 barg…"
Severity
Critical
Verdict
Non-Compliant
Confidence
87%

Run on your standards. On your documents.

2-week scoped pilot. 1 representative standard, 8–10 sample documents. A working prototype benchmarked against your manual review. No platform commitment.